Answer to Question 1
d
Answer to Question 2
The Fourth Amendment and the expectation of privacy is continually being tested and evaluated by the Supreme Court, and in particular how it relates to technology. Courts have long allowed warrantless searches of cell phones in connection with arrest claiming the need to protect officers and prevent destruction of evidence. In 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Riley v. California unanimously rules that the police need warrants to search the cellphones they arrest. This ruling may extend to tablets and laptops. This ruling is one of the first computer-search cases and is path-breaking. Opinion by the justices indicated that just because people can now carry such extensive and personal information, doesn't not make it any less worthy of protection of privacy. In regard to the destruction of evidence, police can take safety measures such as removing a battery or turning a phone off and hold the phone until a warrant can be obtained.
Telangiectasias usually occurs in women and on the face
The Upper Cave at Zhoukoudian yields ages of about 25,000 years for Homo sapiens.
With fewer men than women in college, is it time to consider affirmative action for men?
Carbon Dioxide Concentrations for 400,000 years
Victims of police-reported intimate partner violence 2017 to 2018
Teens who date in early adoles-cence are more likely to become sexually active