Answer to Question 1
d
Answer to Question 2
The Fourth Amendment and the expectation of privacy is continually being tested and evaluated by the Supreme Court, and in particular how it relates to technology. Courts have long allowed warrantless searches of cell phones in connection with arrest claiming the need to protect officers and prevent destruction of evidence. In 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Riley v. California unanimously rules that the police need warrants to search the cellphones they arrest. This ruling may extend to tablets and laptops. This ruling is one of the first computer-search cases and is path-breaking. Opinion by the justices indicated that just because people can now carry such extensive and personal information, doesn't not make it any less worthy of protection of privacy. In regard to the destruction of evidence, police can take safety measures such as removing a battery or turning a phone off and hold the phone until a warrant can be obtained.
Change in Drawing Abilities from Early to Middle Childhood Drawings become more realistic as fine m
Hong Kong is a strange situation. A British colony since 1842, it was handed back to China in 1997 a
During the Pullman strike in Chicago, workers protesting wage cuts did $340,000 in property damage,
Men’s work? Women’s work? Customs in other societies can blow away stereotypes. As is common ...
Climate change occurs over millions of years
Teens who date in early adoles-cence are more likely to become sexually active