Answer to Question 1
d
Answer to Question 2
The Fourth Amendment and the expectation of privacy is continually being tested and evaluated by the Supreme Court, and in particular how it relates to technology. Courts have long allowed warrantless searches of cell phones in connection with arrest claiming the need to protect officers and prevent destruction of evidence. In 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Riley v. California unanimously rules that the police need warrants to search the cellphones they arrest. This ruling may extend to tablets and laptops. This ruling is one of the first computer-search cases and is path-breaking. Opinion by the justices indicated that just because people can now carry such extensive and personal information, doesn't not make it any less worthy of protection of privacy. In regard to the destruction of evidence, police can take safety measures such as removing a battery or turning a phone off and hold the phone until a warrant can be obtained.
On March 25, 1911, as scores of young factory girls leaped to their deaths from the eighth, ninth, a
Review of Health and Illness over the Adult Years
Working and Living and Playing in the City Dump of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Proportion of Women and Men in the U.S. Labor Force
The Gender Pay Gap Over Time: What Percentage of Men's Income Do Women Earn?
Siri plans to retire in 18 years and would like to receive $10 000.00 per month for twenty ...