This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Dissenting justices in Faretta v. California (1975 ) believed that the majority placed the right of ... (Read 60 times)

roselinechinyere27m

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Dissenting justices in Faretta v. California (1975 ) believed that the majority placed the right of pro se defense above that of a fair trial.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

What is retroactivity? How does it differ in the appeals process versus the habeas corpus process?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

yifu223

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

Retroactivity is the extent to which a decision should be applied to prior defendants in a similar predicament.




roselinechinyere27m

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Aug 24, 2018
Excellent


Liamb2179

  • Member
  • Posts: 365
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Approximately 500,000 babies are born each year in the United States to teenage mothers.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

The modern decimal position system was the invention of the Hindus (around 800 AD), involving the placing of numerals to indicate their value (units, tens, hundreds, and so on).

Did you know?

Bacteria have flourished on the earth for over three billion years. They were the first life forms on the planet.

Did you know?

Amphetamine poisoning can cause intravascular coagulation, circulatory collapse, rhabdomyolysis, ischemic colitis, acute psychosis, hyperthermia, respiratory distress syndrome, and pericarditis.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library