This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Dissenting justices in Faretta v. California (1975 ) believed that the majority placed the right of ... (Read 69 times)

roselinechinyere27m

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Dissenting justices in Faretta v. California (1975 ) believed that the majority placed the right of pro se defense above that of a fair trial.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

What is retroactivity? How does it differ in the appeals process versus the habeas corpus process?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

yifu223

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

Retroactivity is the extent to which a decision should be applied to prior defendants in a similar predicament.




roselinechinyere27m

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Aug 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


kjohnson

  • Member
  • Posts: 330
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

In 1835 it was discovered that a disease of silkworms known as muscardine could be transferred from one silkworm to another, and was caused by a fungus.

Did you know?

The horizontal fraction bar was introduced by the Arabs.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library