Fearon argues that it is puzzling to see states choosing war ...

[karateprodigy]

Fearon argues that it is puzzling to see states choosing war because
 
  a. adversaries can always negotiate an agreement that precludes war.
  b. war is inherently a gamble.
  c. two adversaries are always likely to lose more than they gain by fighting.
  d. there is probably no issueor fewupon which it is impossible for states to reach a negotiated agreement.
  e. war is never an accident.

Question 2

Fearon argues that under certain conditions, states will choose war instead of peace. Which of the following do these conditions include?
 
  a. States may choose war if they cannot reach a mutually preferable negotiated settlement with an adversary.
  b. States may choose war as a means through which to show off their military might.
  c. States may choose war if they think they are a good match to their adversary.
  d. States may choose war to detract from their lack of good faith in honoring established agreements.
  e. States may choose war as a way to camouflage their own weaknesses.

[Mollythedog]

Answer to Question 1

Answer: b

Answer to Question 2

Answer: a