Fearon argues that it is puzzling to see states choosing war because
a. adversaries can always negotiate an agreement that precludes war.
b. war is inherently a gamble.
c. two adversaries are always likely to lose more than they gain by fighting.
d. there is probably no issueor fewupon which it is impossible for states to reach a negotiated agreement.
e. war is never an accident.
Question 2
Fearon argues that under certain conditions, states will choose war instead of peace. Which of the following do these conditions include?
a. States may choose war if they cannot reach a mutually preferable negotiated settlement with an adversary.
b. States may choose war as a means through which to show off their military might.
c. States may choose war if they think they are a good match to their adversary.
d. States may choose war to detract from their lack of good faith in honoring established agreements.
e. States may choose war as a way to camouflage their own weaknesses.
Diversity in the United States
A woman in a net on a Congo shore. Although the importation of slaves was illegal after 1807, histor
Personality differences in the United States
States and territories that have adopted their own version of HAZWOPER for all workers are shown in ...
Created Equal: A Social and Political History of the United States, Brief Edition
Regulatory effects of the vascular endothelium in normal and pathologic states