Fearon argues that it is puzzling to see states choosing war because
a. adversaries can always negotiate an agreement that precludes war.
b. war is inherently a gamble.
c. two adversaries are always likely to lose more than they gain by fighting.
d. there is probably no issueor fewupon which it is impossible for states to reach a negotiated agreement.
e. war is never an accident.
Question 2
Fearon argues that under certain conditions, states will choose war instead of peace. Which of the following do these conditions include?
a. States may choose war if they cannot reach a mutually preferable negotiated settlement with an adversary.
b. States may choose war as a means through which to show off their military might.
c. States may choose war if they think they are a good match to their adversary.
d. States may choose war to detract from their lack of good faith in honoring established agreements.
e. States may choose war as a way to camouflage their own weaknesses.
The United States and Its Territories, 1787–1802
The percentage of women over 40 in the United States who are childless has almost doubled in the ...
How Safe Is Your State? Violent Crime in the United States
For millions of people, the United States represents a land of opportunity and freedom from ...
Guide to Major Massage Therapy Organizations in the United States*
Applying the bill of rights to the states