This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An individual liable for negligence might not have intended to injure another person. a. True b. ... (Read 126 times)

chandani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
An individual liable for negligence might not have intended to injure another person.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

A(n) ______ an unreasonable interference with a right held in common by the general public.
 a. public nuisance
  b. property nuisance c. private nuisance
  d. unreasonable nuisance
  e. none of the other choices are correct



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

iman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

a




chandani

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Gracias!


T4T

  • Member
  • Posts: 348
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Many supplement containers do not even contain what their labels say. There are many documented reports of products containing much less, or more, that what is listed on their labels. They may also contain undisclosed prescription drugs and even contaminants.

Did you know?

More than 4.4billion prescriptions were dispensed within the United States in 2016.

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

Atropine was named after the Greek goddess Atropos, the oldest and ugliest of the three sisters known as the Fates, who controlled the destiny of men.

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library