This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An individual liable for negligence might not have intended to injure another person. a. True b. ... (Read 319 times)

chandani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
An individual liable for negligence might not have intended to injure another person.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

A(n) ______ an unreasonable interference with a right held in common by the general public.
 a. public nuisance
  b. property nuisance c. private nuisance
  d. unreasonable nuisance
  e. none of the other choices are correct



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

iman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

a




chandani

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Gracias!


dantucker

  • Member
  • Posts: 346
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

Carbamazepine can interfere with the results of home pregnancy tests. If you are taking carbamazepine, do not try to test for pregnancy at home.

Did you know?

In 1864, the first barbiturate (barbituric acid) was synthesized.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

The horizontal fraction bar was introduced by the Arabs.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library