Author Question: In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan a. had been discriminated ... (Read 43 times)

Diane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan
 
 

a. had been discriminated against because of whistle blowing.
  b. was innocent of insider trading.
  c. violated the FCPA despite never having gone overseas.
  d. had misappropriated confidential information



Question 2

The Donald Wohlgemuth case shows that
 
 

a. trade secrets can be patented.
  b. trade secrets often become an integral part of an employee's total job skills and capabilities.
  c. employees need to divest themselves of any skill acquired while handling trade secrets.
  d. noncompete or nondisclosure contracts are always legally valid.




ryrychapman11

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Warfarin was developed as a consequence of the study of a strange bleeding disorder that suddenly occurred in cattle on the northern prairies of the United States in the early 1900s.

Did you know?

According to research, pregnant women tend to eat more if carrying a baby boy. Male fetuses may secrete a chemical that stimulates their mothers to step up her energy intake.

Did you know?

Opium has influenced much of the world's most popular literature. The following authors were all opium users, of varying degrees: Lewis Carroll, Charles, Dickens, Arthur Conan Doyle, and Oscar Wilde.

Did you know?

Astigmatism is the most common vision problem. It may accompany nearsightedness or farsightedness. It is usually caused by an irregularly shaped cornea, but sometimes it is the result of an irregularly shaped lens. Either type can be corrected by eyeglasses, contact lenses, or refractive surgery.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library