Author Question: In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan a. had been discriminated ... (Read 108 times)

Diane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan
 
 

a. had been discriminated against because of whistle blowing.
  b. was innocent of insider trading.
  c. violated the FCPA despite never having gone overseas.
  d. had misappropriated confidential information



Question 2

The Donald Wohlgemuth case shows that
 
 

a. trade secrets can be patented.
  b. trade secrets often become an integral part of an employee's total job skills and capabilities.
  c. employees need to divest themselves of any skill acquired while handling trade secrets.
  d. noncompete or nondisclosure contracts are always legally valid.




ryrychapman11

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The term pharmacology is derived from the Greek words pharmakon("claim, medicine, poison, or remedy") and logos ("study").

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

The most dangerous mercury compound, dimethyl mercury, is so toxic that even a few microliters spilled on the skin can cause death. Mercury has been shown to accumulate in higher amounts in the following types of fish than other types: swordfish, shark, mackerel, tilefish, crab, and tuna.

Did you know?

More than 34,000 trademarked medication names and more than 10,000 generic medication names are in use in the United States.

Did you know?

If all the neurons in the human body were lined up, they would stretch more than 600 miles.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library