Author Question: In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan a. had been discriminated ... (Read 99 times)

Diane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan
 
 

a. had been discriminated against because of whistle blowing.
  b. was innocent of insider trading.
  c. violated the FCPA despite never having gone overseas.
  d. had misappropriated confidential information



Question 2

The Donald Wohlgemuth case shows that
 
 

a. trade secrets can be patented.
  b. trade secrets often become an integral part of an employee's total job skills and capabilities.
  c. employees need to divest themselves of any skill acquired while handling trade secrets.
  d. noncompete or nondisclosure contracts are always legally valid.




ryrychapman11

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Each year in the United States, there are approximately six million pregnancies. This means that at any one time, about 4% of women in the United States are pregnant.

Did you know?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA was discovered in 1961 in the United Kingdom. It if often referred to as a superbug. MRSA infections cause more deaths in the United States every year than AIDS.

Methicilli ...
Did you know?

The first oral chemotherapy drug for colon cancer was approved by FDA in 2001.

Did you know?

In 1885, the Lloyd Manufacturing Company of Albany, New York, promoted and sold "Cocaine Toothache Drops" at 15 cents per bottle! In 1914, the Harrison Narcotic Act brought the sale and distribution of this drug under federal control.

Did you know?

Many of the drugs used by neuroscientists are derived from toxic plants and venomous animals (such as snakes, spiders, snails, and puffer fish).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library