Author Question: The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the A) balancing doctrine. B) clear and ... (Read 48 times)

ishan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the
 
  A) balancing doctrine.
   B) clear and present danger doctrine.
   C) fighting words doctrine.
   D) prior restraint doctrine.
   E) separation of church and state doctrine.

Question 2

Government programs and regulations that directly affect those living with the country are called
 
  A) welfare policy. B) general policy. C) domestic policy. D) foreign policy. E) social policy.



gstein359

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Less than one of every three adults with high LDL cholesterol has the condition under control. Only 48.1% with the condition are being treated for it.

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

Famous people who died from poisoning or drug overdose include, Adolf Hitler, Socrates, Juan Ponce de Leon, Marilyn Monroe, Judy Garland, and John Belushi.

Did you know?

In 1844, Charles Goodyear obtained the first patent for a rubber condom.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library