Author Question: Why should a researcher not interpret a correlation that is not statistically significant? a. it ... (Read 64 times)

javeds

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Why should a researcher not interpret a correlation that is not statistically significant?
 
  a. it is based on too few participants
   b. the correlation in the population is likely to be zero
  c. it is not a perfect correlation
  d. correlation does not imply causality
  e. the data are likely to contain outliers

Question 2

An correlational analysis that involves two variables is called
 
  a. measured.
  b. analytical.
  c. linear.
  d. bivariate.



heinisk01

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

Approximately 15–25% of recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, many miscarriages often occur before a woman even knows she is pregnant.

Did you know?

Illness; diuretics; laxative abuse; hot weather; exercise; sweating; caffeine; alcoholic beverages; starvation diets; inadequate carbohydrate consumption; and diets high in protein, salt, or fiber can cause people to become dehydrated.

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

Did you know?

Elderly adults are at greatest risk of stroke and myocardial infarction and have the most to gain from prophylaxis. Patients ages 60 to 80 years with blood pressures above 160/90 mm Hg should benefit from antihypertensive treatment.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library