Author Question: Why should a researcher not interpret a correlation that is not statistically significant? a. it ... (Read 24 times)

javeds

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Why should a researcher not interpret a correlation that is not statistically significant?
 
  a. it is based on too few participants
   b. the correlation in the population is likely to be zero
  c. it is not a perfect correlation
  d. correlation does not imply causality
  e. the data are likely to contain outliers

Question 2

An correlational analysis that involves two variables is called
 
  a. measured.
  b. analytical.
  c. linear.
  d. bivariate.



heinisk01

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

Opium has influenced much of the world's most popular literature. The following authors were all opium users, of varying degrees: Lewis Carroll, Charles, Dickens, Arthur Conan Doyle, and Oscar Wilde.

Did you know?

Cocaine was isolated in 1860 and first used as a local anesthetic in 1884. Its first clinical use was by Sigmund Freud to wean a patient from morphine addiction. The fictional character Sherlock Holmes was supposed to be addicted to cocaine by injection.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

Patients who have undergone chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer often complain of a lack of mental focus; memory loss; and a general diminution in abilities such as multitasking, attention span, and general mental agility.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library