Author Question: Why should a researcher not interpret a correlation that is not statistically significant? a. it ... (Read 81 times)

javeds

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Why should a researcher not interpret a correlation that is not statistically significant?
 
  a. it is based on too few participants
   b. the correlation in the population is likely to be zero
  c. it is not a perfect correlation
  d. correlation does not imply causality
  e. the data are likely to contain outliers

Question 2

An correlational analysis that involves two variables is called
 
  a. measured.
  b. analytical.
  c. linear.
  d. bivariate.



heinisk01

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The cure for trichomoniasis is easy as long as the patient does not drink alcoholic beverages for 24 hours. Just a single dose of medication is needed to rid the body of the disease. However, without proper precautions, an individual may contract the disease repeatedly. In fact, most people develop trichomoniasis again within three months of their last treatment.

Did you know?

Though the United States has largely rejected the metric system, it is used for currency, as in 100 pennies = 1 dollar. Previously, the British currency system was used, with measurements such as 12 pence to the shilling, and 20 shillings to the pound.

Did you know?

Congestive heart failure is a serious disorder that carries a reduced life expectancy. Heart failure is usually a chronic illness, and it may worsen with infection or other physical stressors.

Did you know?

More than 4.4billion prescriptions were dispensed within the United States in 2016.

Did you know?

Liver spots have nothing whatsoever to do with the liver. They are a type of freckles commonly seen in older adults who have been out in the sun without sufficient sunscreen.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library