This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient? a. the Tarasoff ... (Read 169 times)

burton19126

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient?
 
  a. the Tarasoff case
  b. the Bradley case
  c. the Jablonski case
  d. the Hedlund case
  e. the Jaffee case

Question 2

The responsibility to protect the public from dangerous acts of violent clients entails liability for civil damages when practitioners neglect this duty by:
 
  a. failing to diagnose or predict dangerous behavior.
  b. failing to warn potential victims of violent behavior.
  c. failing to commit dangerous individuals.
  d. prematurely discharging dangerous clients from the hospital.
  e. all of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

yeungji

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: B

Answer to Question 2

ANS: E





 

Did you know?

Looking at the sun may not only cause headache and distort your vision temporarily, but it can also cause permanent eye damage. Any exposure to sunlight adds to the cumulative effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on your eyes. UV exposure has been linked to eye disorders such as macular degeneration, solar retinitis, and corneal dystrophies.

Did you know?

On average, someone in the United States has a stroke about every 40 seconds. This is about 795,000 people per year.

Did you know?

On average, the stomach produces 2 L of hydrochloric acid per day.

Did you know?

The horizontal fraction bar was introduced by the Arabs.

Did you know?

Patients who cannot swallow may receive nutrition via a parenteral route—usually, a catheter is inserted through the chest into a large vein going into the heart.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library