This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient? a. the Tarasoff ... (Read 204 times)

burton19126

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient?
 
  a. the Tarasoff case
  b. the Bradley case
  c. the Jablonski case
  d. the Hedlund case
  e. the Jaffee case

Question 2

The responsibility to protect the public from dangerous acts of violent clients entails liability for civil damages when practitioners neglect this duty by:
 
  a. failing to diagnose or predict dangerous behavior.
  b. failing to warn potential victims of violent behavior.
  c. failing to commit dangerous individuals.
  d. prematurely discharging dangerous clients from the hospital.
  e. all of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

yeungji

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: B

Answer to Question 2

ANS: E





 

Did you know?

Amoebae are the simplest type of protozoans, and are characterized by a feeding and dividing trophozoite stage that moves by temporary extensions called pseudopodia or false feet.

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

Did you know?

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood disease in the world. Most children who develop asthma have symptoms before they are 5 years old.

Did you know?

Only 12 hours after an egg cell is fertilized by a sperm cell, the egg cell starts to divide. As it continues to divide, it moves along the fallopian tube toward the uterus at about 1 inch per day.

Did you know?

If all the neurons in the human body were lined up, they would stretch more than 600 miles.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library