This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient? a. the Tarasoff ... (Read 168 times)

burton19126

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient?
 
  a. the Tarasoff case
  b. the Bradley case
  c. the Jablonski case
  d. the Hedlund case
  e. the Jaffee case

Question 2

The responsibility to protect the public from dangerous acts of violent clients entails liability for civil damages when practitioners neglect this duty by:
 
  a. failing to diagnose or predict dangerous behavior.
  b. failing to warn potential victims of violent behavior.
  c. failing to commit dangerous individuals.
  d. prematurely discharging dangerous clients from the hospital.
  e. all of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

yeungji

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: B

Answer to Question 2

ANS: E





 

Did you know?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic. Eight ounces of water is needed to metabolize just 1 ounce of alcohol.

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

Most fungi that pathogenically affect humans live in soil. If a person is not healthy, has an open wound, or is immunocompromised, a fungal infection can be very aggressive.

Did you know?

Complications of influenza include: bacterial pneumonia, ear and sinus infections, dehydration, and worsening of chronic conditions such as asthma, congestive heart failure, or diabetes.

Did you know?

The lipid bilayer is made of phospholipids. They are arranged in a double layer because one of their ends is attracted to water while the other is repelled by water.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library