This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient? a. the Tarasoff ... (Read 171 times)

burton19126

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Which case dealt with the duty NOT to negligently release a dangerous patient?
 
  a. the Tarasoff case
  b. the Bradley case
  c. the Jablonski case
  d. the Hedlund case
  e. the Jaffee case

Question 2

The responsibility to protect the public from dangerous acts of violent clients entails liability for civil damages when practitioners neglect this duty by:
 
  a. failing to diagnose or predict dangerous behavior.
  b. failing to warn potential victims of violent behavior.
  c. failing to commit dangerous individuals.
  d. prematurely discharging dangerous clients from the hospital.
  e. all of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

yeungji

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: B

Answer to Question 2

ANS: E





 

Did you know?

The longest a person has survived after a heart transplant is 24 years.

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

The first oral chemotherapy drug for colon cancer was approved by FDA in 2001.

Did you know?

Pink eye is a term that refers to conjunctivitis, which is inflammation of the thin, clear membrane (conjunctiva) over the white part of the eye (sclera). It may be triggered by a virus, bacteria, or foreign body in the eye. Antibiotic eye drops alleviate bacterial conjunctivitis, and antihistamine allergy pills or eye drops help control allergic conjunctivitis symptoms.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library