This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on ... (Read 80 times)

chandani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on restructuring Joe's finances, creating trust funds for his children, and moving some of his money to off-shore accounts. When Cheri moved to the Gnew Law Firm, she participated in Gnew's standard conflict check and discovered no potential conflicts. Some months later, Gnew took on a new collection matter from Bank of West Virginia: Bank v. Joe Thames. Cheri has not been assigned to the case and, in fact, doesn't even work on the same floor as the collection team at Gnew. What is Cheri's obligation?
 
  A) Cheri can but does not have to say anything about the conflict so long as she does not divulge any confidential information about Joe.
  B) Cheri should quit her job at Gnew before the whole firm is disqualified from the case.
  C) Cheri must bring this information to her supervising lawyer even though she is not working on the case because the law assumes that she will divulge confidential information that is adverse to her former client.
  D) Cheri should not say anything about the conflict because she was not assigned to the case.

Question 2

While at Scott & French, Paralegal Nancy worked as part of the litigation team representing the plaintiff in Big Corp vs. Little Corp When Nancy leaves Scott & French to accept a job with William & Marks, she learns that her new employer is contemplating representing Big Corp in a merger with Medium Corp Nancy
 
  A) probably has a conflict of interest if William & Marks takes on the representation AND if the firm assigns Nancy to that matter.
  B) probably has a conflict of interest due to her representation of Big Corp. while at Scott & French.
  C) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new representation does not appear to be materially adverse to the former representation.
  D) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new matter is not litigation.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Jadwiga9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C




chandani

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
Reply 2 on: Aug 3, 2018
:D TYSM


T4T

  • Member
  • Posts: 348
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

A serious new warning has been established for pregnant women against taking ACE inhibitors during pregnancy. In the study, the risk of major birth defects in children whose mothers took ACE inhibitors during the first trimester was nearly three times higher than in children whose mothers didn't take ACE inhibitors. Physicians can prescribe alternative medications for pregnant women who have symptoms of high blood pressure.

Did you know?

There are over 65,000 known species of protozoa. About 10,000 species are parasitic.

Did you know?

The FDA recognizes 118 routes of administration.

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

Nitroglycerin is used to alleviate various heart-related conditions, and it is also the chief component of dynamite (but mixed in a solid clay base to stabilize it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library