Author Question: Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder? What will be an ideal ... (Read 25 times)

sc00by25

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What would happen if a court reporter were not accurate?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



flexer1n1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Answer to Question 1

Because a live court reporter can more accurately detect what is being said and what is being recorded, where an electronic recorder may malfunction or pick up extraneous noises. Students may also give their own individual responses to this question.

Answer to Question 2

The integrity of the record as well as the profession would be in jeopardy. Transcripts could not be trusted as to their reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Sildenafil (Viagra®) has two actions that may be of consequence in patients with heart disease. It can lower the blood pressure, and it can interact with nitrates. It should never be used in patients who are taking nitrates.

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

Drying your hands with a paper towel will reduce the bacterial count on your hands by 45–60%.

Did you know?

Nitroglycerin is used to alleviate various heart-related conditions, and it is also the chief component of dynamite (but mixed in a solid clay base to stabilize it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library