This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Is using realtime with a court reporter less expensive than using an electronic recorder? Why or why ... (Read 90 times)

joesmith1212

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Is using realtime with a court reporter less expensive than using an electronic recorder? Why or why not?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Sometimes court reporters may be required to testify in open court regarding the accuracy of their notes or transcripts.
 
  a. True
  b. False



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

bhavsar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
Answer to Question 1

In the long run, yes. What may appear to be a short-term saving; that is replacing court reporters with an electronic recorder, will ultimately cost more when taking into consideration the expense of having the recordings transcribed. The transcription process can be very time consuming and expensive which may result in a greater expense than using the court reporter from the beginning.

Answer to Question 2

A




joesmith1212

  • Member
  • Posts: 549
Reply 2 on: Aug 3, 2018
Excellent


emsimon14

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Everyone has one nostril that is larger than the other.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

Many medications that are used to treat infertility are injected subcutaneously. This is easy to do using the anterior abdomen as the site of injection but avoiding the area directly around the belly button.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library