This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in ... (Read 38 times)

meagbuch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in part, by:
 
  a. information from a reliable informant.
  b. a flyer or bulletin from another jurisdiction.
  c. the smell of marijuana.
  d. unprovoked flight upon seeing the police.

Question 2

In the absence of some justification, the overt display of police weapons during a stop may convert the stop into a/an:
 
  a. seizure.
  b. search.
  c. arrest.
  d. detention.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

poopface

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c





 

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

In women, pharmacodynamic differences include increased sensitivity to (and increased effectiveness of) beta-blockers, opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and typical antipsychotics.

Did you know?

Amphetamine poisoning can cause intravascular coagulation, circulatory collapse, rhabdomyolysis, ischemic colitis, acute psychosis, hyperthermia, respiratory distress syndrome, and pericarditis.

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

The top five reasons that children stay home from school are as follows: colds, stomach flu (gastroenteritis), ear infection (otitis media), pink eye (conjunctivitis), and sore throat.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library