This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in ... (Read 41 times)

meagbuch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in part, by:
 
  a. information from a reliable informant.
  b. a flyer or bulletin from another jurisdiction.
  c. the smell of marijuana.
  d. unprovoked flight upon seeing the police.

Question 2

In the absence of some justification, the overt display of police weapons during a stop may convert the stop into a/an:
 
  a. seizure.
  b. search.
  c. arrest.
  d. detention.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

poopface

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c





 

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

A headache when you wake up in the morning is indicative of sinusitis. Other symptoms of sinusitis can include fever, weakness, tiredness, a cough that may be more severe at night, and a runny nose or nasal congestion.

Did you know?

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) in overdose can seriously damage the liver. It should never be taken by people who use alcohol heavily; it can result in severe liver damage and even a condition requiring a liver transplant.

Did you know?

In 1885, the Lloyd Manufacturing Company of Albany, New York, promoted and sold "Cocaine Toothache Drops" at 15 cents per bottle! In 1914, the Harrison Narcotic Act brought the sale and distribution of this drug under federal control.

Did you know?

Bacteria have been found alive in a lake buried one half mile under ice in Antarctica.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library