This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in ... (Read 67 times)

meagbuch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in part, by:
 
  a. information from a reliable informant.
  b. a flyer or bulletin from another jurisdiction.
  c. the smell of marijuana.
  d. unprovoked flight upon seeing the police.

Question 2

In the absence of some justification, the overt display of police weapons during a stop may convert the stop into a/an:
 
  a. seizure.
  b. search.
  c. arrest.
  d. detention.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

poopface

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c





 

Did you know?

Calcitonin is a naturally occurring hormone. In women who are at least 5 years beyond menopause, it slows bone loss and increases spinal bone density.

Did you know?

Less than one of every three adults with high LDL cholesterol has the condition under control. Only 48.1% with the condition are being treated for it.

Did you know?

Pubic lice (crabs) are usually spread through sexual contact. You cannot catch them by using a public toilet.

Did you know?

Nearly all drugs pass into human breast milk. How often a drug is taken influences the amount of drug that will pass into the milk. Medications taken 30 to 60 minutes before breastfeeding are likely to be at peak blood levels when the baby is nursing.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library