In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a ...

[meagbuch]

In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in part, by:
 
  a. information from a reliable informant.
  b. a flyer or bulletin from another jurisdiction.
  c. the smell of marijuana.
  d. unprovoked flight upon seeing the police.

Question 2

In the absence of some justification, the overt display of police weapons during a stop may convert the stop into a/an:
 
  a. seizure.
  b. search.
  c. arrest.
  d. detention.

[poopface]

Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c

[meagbuch]

TY

[poopface]

You're welcome