Author Question: Which is the best interpretation of the 1991 Acevedo case? A) Items that fall in the plain view ... (Read 49 times)

JGIBBSON

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
Which is the best interpretation of the 1991 Acevedo case?
 
  A) Items that fall in the plain view of a lawfully present police officer may be seized and used as evidence in court.
  B) An officer may not search a vehicle without a search warrant.
  C) Officers may not move any item to get a better view of evidence otherwise hidden from view.
  D) An officer who has probable cause to believe that a container in a vehicle holds contraband may open the container and seize the contraband.

Question 2

Which U.S. Supreme Court interpretations are exceptions to the exclusionary rule?
  I. Good faith
  II. Second-party consent
  III. Inevitable discovery
  IV. Computer errors
 
  A) II, III
  B) I, III, IV
  C) I, IV
  D) I, II, III, IV



dellikani2015

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

Answer: D

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

Asthma attacks and symptoms usually get started by specific triggers (such as viruses, allergies, gases, and air particles). You should talk to your doctor about these triggers and find ways to avoid or get rid of them.

Did you know?

The first oncogene was discovered in 1970 and was termed SRC (pronounced "SARK").

Did you know?

This year, an estimated 1.4 million Americans will have a new or recurrent heart attack.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library