Which is the best interpretation of the 1991 Acevedo case?
A) Items that fall in the plain view of a lawfully present police officer may be seized and used as evidence in court.
B) An officer may not search a vehicle without a search warrant.
C) Officers may not move any item to get a better view of evidence otherwise hidden from view.
D) An officer who has probable cause to believe that a container in a vehicle holds contraband may open the container and seize the contraband.
Question 2
Which U.S. Supreme Court interpretations are exceptions to the exclusionary rule?
I. Good faith
II. Second-party consent
III. Inevitable discovery
IV. Computer errors
A) II, III
B) I, III, IV
C) I, IV
D) I, II, III, IV
One view of inclination i (green) and other orbital parameters
Two items from the incomplete-pictures test. H.M.’s memory for the 20 items on the test was ...
Dermatomes of body, anterior view
Posterior view of midbrain in relation to brain stem
Lateral view of right side of brain
A view of colorblindness