Author Question: Which is the best interpretation of the 1991 Acevedo case? A) Items that fall in the plain view ... (Read 48 times)

JGIBBSON

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
Which is the best interpretation of the 1991 Acevedo case?
 
  A) Items that fall in the plain view of a lawfully present police officer may be seized and used as evidence in court.
  B) An officer may not search a vehicle without a search warrant.
  C) Officers may not move any item to get a better view of evidence otherwise hidden from view.
  D) An officer who has probable cause to believe that a container in a vehicle holds contraband may open the container and seize the contraband.

Question 2

Which U.S. Supreme Court interpretations are exceptions to the exclusionary rule?
  I. Good faith
  II. Second-party consent
  III. Inevitable discovery
  IV. Computer errors
 
  A) II, III
  B) I, III, IV
  C) I, IV
  D) I, II, III, IV



dellikani2015

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

Answer: D

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

During pregnancy, a woman is more likely to experience bleeding gums and nosebleeds caused by hormonal changes that increase blood flow to the mouth and nose.

Did you know?

Between 1999 and 2012, American adults with high total cholesterol decreased from 18.3% to 12.9%

Did you know?

The most dangerous mercury compound, dimethyl mercury, is so toxic that even a few microliters spilled on the skin can cause death. Mercury has been shown to accumulate in higher amounts in the following types of fish than other types: swordfish, shark, mackerel, tilefish, crab, and tuna.

Did you know?

In the United States, an estimated 50 million unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed for viral respiratory infections.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library