Author Question: Employers do not have to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs if doing so would impose an ... (Read 112 times)

strangeaffliction · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

Employers do not have to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs if doing so would impose an undue hardship on the business.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Was the restraint reasonably necessary to protect Nike's business?

Carissamariew · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

The court held that Nike has a legitimate interest in enforcing the agreement, because there is a substantial risk that McCarthy in shaping Reebok's product allocation, sales and pricing strategies could enable Reebok to divert a significant amount of Nike's footwear sales given the highly confidential information McCarthy acquired at Nike. Accordingly, the restraint was reasonably necessary to protect Nike's business.