Employers do not have to accommodate an employee's religious ...

[strangeaffliction]

Employers do not have to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs if doing so would impose an undue hardship on the business.
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Was the restraint reasonably necessary to protect Nike's business?

[Carissamariew]

Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

The court held that Nike has a legitimate interest in enforcing the agreement, because there is a substantial risk that McCarthy  in shaping Reebok's product allocation, sales and pricing strategies  could enable Reebok to divert a significant amount of Nike's footwear sales given the highly confidential information McCarthy acquired at Nike. Accordingly, the restraint was reasonably necessary to protect Nike's business.

[strangeaffliction]

Gracias!

[jordangronback]

Excellent