Author Question: Was the supervisor's order to perform maintenance duties on the old section of the screen contrary ... (Read 52 times)

JGIBBSON · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

Was the supervisor's order to perform maintenance duties on the old section of the screen contrary to the company's directive not to step on the screen or the angle iron supporting the structure?

Question 2

The CBA at Grey Corp has expired, as has the CBA at Blue Corp At Grey, union and management have bargained a new CBA to impasse. Suddenly, Grey locks out all union workers. The next day, during a bargaining session at Blue, management announces that it will not discuss pay increases.
a. Grey has committed a ULP but Blue has not.
b. Blue has committed a ULP but Grey has not.
c. Both Blue and Grey have committed ULPs.
d. Neither company has created a ULP.
e. Grey and Blue have violated labor laws, but not by committing ULPs.

brittrenee · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

After the June 18, 1974, incident where an employee fell to his death through the guard screen, the company issued an order strictly forbidding maintenance employees from stepping on either the screens or the angle iron structures. The supervisor's order appears to have been in direct violation of the company's directive.

Answer to Question 2

.B