Author Question: Did the Supreme Court see TWA's guarantees to crossovers that they would not be displaced by senior ... (Read 60 times)

james9437 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

Did the Supreme Court see TWA's guarantees to crossovers that they would not be displaced by senior full-term strikers as an unlawful employer tactic destructive to the right to strike?

Question 2

Marsha, a supervisor, furiously berates Ted in front of 14 other employees, calling him a loser, an incompetent, a failure as an employee and as a person.. She hands around copies of Ted's work and for twenty minutes mocks his efforts. If Ted sues Marsha, his best claim will be
a. Assault.
b. Battery.
c. Intentional infliction of emotional distress.
d. Negligence.
e. Interference with a contract.

mrphibs · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

No. The Supreme Court considered TWA's guarantee to crossovers that they would not be displaced by returning senior full-term strikers as the exercise of peaceful economic power, which the comp-any was free to deploy once the dispute resolution mechanisms of the RLA were exhausted.

Answer to Question 2

.C