Author Question: Explain the secondary nature of Local 164's actions in this case which were held to be a violation ... (Read 20 times)

nelaaney · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

Explain the secondary nature of Local 164's actions in this case which were held to be a violation of Section 8(b)(4).

Question 2

Which of the following historic events led to a significant change in corporation laws, and permitted companies to follow the stakeholder model?
a. The Great Depression
b. World War II
c. The Election of John F. Kennedy
d. The Moon Landing
e. The Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education

lcapri7 · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

The picketing by Local 164 was not against Star-Lo, the contractor that utilizes Local 164
electricians, which would be primary activity protected under the NLRA. Rather the
picketing in this case by Local 164 was calculated to induce neutral employees to
engage in a work stoppage against PCT, to pressure PCT (and Ernst & Young) to
reassign the work to a Local 164 contractor Star-Lo.

Answer to Question 2

.B