In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held:
a. Oklahoma has a paramount interest in preserving its natural resources, so the law stands b. Oklahoma has no interest in preserving minnows, so the law fails
c. Oklahoma was improperly taking property without compensation
d. regulation of fish falls under the Fish and Wildlife Service, so Oklahoma preempted a federal law e. Oklahoma was using a discriminatory method to achieve its conservation goals
Question 2
In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held that the law was inconsistent with the basic principle that:
a. our legal unit is the Nation
b. our economic unit is the State c. the State has ultimate authority
d. the Nation has ultimate authority e. none of the other choices
Three principle forms of natural selection: (a) stabilizing selection, (b) directional selection, an
Action! Children love to talk about the actions of adults and animals, which provides a natural way ...
When a Tornado Strikes: Social Organization Following a Natural Disaster
Earth scientists have devised a scheme to divide the planet’s natural history into distinct time ...
Natural Resource Prices, 1850–2010