In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held:
a. Oklahoma has a paramount interest in preserving its natural resources, so the law stands b. Oklahoma has no interest in preserving minnows, so the law fails
c. Oklahoma was improperly taking property without compensation
d. regulation of fish falls under the Fish and Wildlife Service, so Oklahoma preempted a federal law e. Oklahoma was using a discriminatory method to achieve its conservation goals
Question 2
In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held that the law was inconsistent with the basic principle that:
a. our legal unit is the Nation
b. our economic unit is the State c. the State has ultimate authority
d. the Nation has ultimate authority e. none of the other choices
Evolutionary adaptation to a new environment via natural selection.
Increasing Costs of Natural Disasters
Natural abundance of Mercury
Use rubber gloves (latex or nonlatex) to cover hands as needed to protect against contamination in ...
La Niña: The impact of natural cycles
The consequences of the intensity of natural selection on allele frequency.