In Naples v. Keystone Building and Development Corp in which the Naples sued Keystone for the cost of repairing major problems in the house Keystone built for the Naples, the state supreme court held that:
a. since there was no contradiction of the expert witness's testimony regarding the cost of repairs, the Naples should be compensated adequately for the damages caused by the defendants' breach of contract
b. since there was no contradiction of the expert witness's testimony regarding the cost of repairs, the Naples should not be compensated adequately for the damages caused by the defendants' breach of contract
c. since there was a contradiction of the expert witness's testimony regarding the cost of repairs, the Naples should not be compensated adequately for the damages caused by the defendants' breach of contract
d. since the defendant did not produce an expert witness, the Naples should be compensated adequately for the damages caused by the defendants' breach of contract
e. none of the other choices are correct
Question 2
In Naples v. Keystone Building and Development Corp in which the Naples sued Keystone for the cost of repairing major problems in the house Keystone built for the Naples, the state supreme court held that:
a. the Naples should be awarded the full amount necessary to restore them to the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed
b. the Naples need not be awarded the full amount necessary to restore them to the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed
c. the Naples should be awarded the half the amount necessary to restore them to the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed
d. the Naples should be awarded 20 of the full amount necessary to restore them to the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed
e. none of the other choices are correct