This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Peter has been subjected to an unreasonable amount of noise from his neighbor, who constantly plays ... (Read 97 times)

Yi-Chen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 550
Peter has been subjected to an unreasonable amount of noise from his neighbor, who constantly plays his stereo at full volume. Peter is angry about his neighbor, but he is even angrier about the excessive pollution being emitted by a local factory that burns old tires in direct violation of a state statute prohibiting such conduct. Do the acts of Peter's neighbor and the factory constitute nuisances? If they do, give Peter assistance on any possible courses of action to eliminate the problems.

Question 2

Megan owns a manufacturing business in a nonattainment area under federal air pollution law. She wishes to triple the size of the manufacturing operation using land she just purchased next to her current location. What must Megan demonstrate in order to secure a permit to operate in the nonattainment area?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

qytan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

A nuisance is defined as an unreasonable interference with the enjoyment or use of land. Peter's neighbor is definitely creating a conflict by his excessive stereo volume; however, the harm that Peter sustains would have to be beyond a mere inconvenience or annoyance with his neighbor's actions to be classified as a nuisance. If Peter's neighbor's actions constitute a nuisance, they would be classified as a private nuisance, since only Peter is affected. Peter would be entitled to monetary damages and possibly an injunction or court order.
The actions of the factory create a nuisance. More particularly, the actions of the factory would constitute a public nuisance, since they affect not just Peter, but the community or public at large. Once again, monetary damages could be sought. In addition, a court injunction would serve to eliminate the problem.

Answer to Question 2

Under the Emissions Offset Policy, Megan must show: (1 ) the new plant will have the greatest possible emissions controls; (2 ) all other operations are in compliance with federal emission standards; and (3 ) the new plant's emissions will be offset by reductions in emissions in other facilities.
COMMENTS:

Note that the effect of this view is to change the prior pattern of issuing building permits, when they were issued as a routine matter so long as the zoning laws were satisfied and a fee was paid. Under this new view, the permit-issuing body must give consideration to the environmental impact statement and exercise discretion in determining whether to issue a building permit.





 

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Nitroglycerin is used to alleviate various heart-related conditions, and it is also the chief component of dynamite (but mixed in a solid clay base to stabilize it).

Did you know?

The eye muscles are the most active muscles in the whole body. The external muscles that move the eyes are the strongest muscles in the human body for the job they have to do. They are 100 times more powerful than they need to be.

Did you know?

Oxytocin is recommended only for pregnancies that have a medical reason for inducing labor (such as eclampsia) and is not recommended for elective procedures or for making the birthing process more convenient.

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library