Jessica was a former employee of Mark. When potential employers called Mark for a reference about Jessica, he stated she was not a very good worker and had been fired for excessive absences. He said he had reason to believe Jessica was on drugs, but he wasn't absolutely certain. Jessica learned what Mark was saying and sued him. In most states
A)under the qualified privilege rule, it was legal for Mark to say what he said if it was true and Mark was not motivated by ill will.
B)it was legal for Mark to say what he said, since courts have consistently ruled that former employers are immune from lawsuits for giving references.
C)it was not proper for Mark to say what he said, since courts have consistently ruled that former employers should not give references over the telephone or in writing without the former employee's written authorization.
D)though it was proper for Mark to talk about Jessica's work-related history, he should have refrained from talking about her potential drug use.
Question 2
Under the UCP, the description of the goods in the commercial invoice must correspond with the description in the credit. In all other documents, the goods may be described _____
A) in perfect conformance with the credit.
B) in general terms not inconsistent with the description of the goods in the credit.
C) in specific terms as requested by the buyer.
D) in general terms consistent with the contract for the sale of goods.
Bay (left) and chestnut (sometimes called "sorrel") are two of the most common coat colors
This wheel presentation is helpful for the detection of potential amphipathic helices
Control of the Membrane Potential
How many potential risks to the health of the embryo and fetus might a mother encounter in an urban ...
Example of an employee performance evaluation form.
Cystic fibrosis is caused by a mutation in a protein called CFTR