Jessica was a former employee of Mark. When potential employers called Mark for a reference about Jessica, he stated she was not a very good worker and had been fired for excessive absences. He said he had reason to believe Jessica was on drugs, but he wasn't absolutely certain. Jessica learned what Mark was saying and sued him. In most states
A)under the qualified privilege rule, it was legal for Mark to say what he said if it was true and Mark was not motivated by ill will.
B)it was legal for Mark to say what he said, since courts have consistently ruled that former employers are immune from lawsuits for giving references.
C)it was not proper for Mark to say what he said, since courts have consistently ruled that former employers should not give references over the telephone or in writing without the former employee's written authorization.
D)though it was proper for Mark to talk about Jessica's work-related history, he should have refrained from talking about her potential drug use.
Question 2
Under the UCP, the description of the goods in the commercial invoice must correspond with the description in the credit. In all other documents, the goods may be described _____
A) in perfect conformance with the credit.
B) in general terms not inconsistent with the description of the goods in the credit.
C) in specific terms as requested by the buyer.
D) in general terms consistent with the contract for the sale of goods.
As sessile organisms, plants have evolved many mechanisms to mitigate the potential damage of abioti
Animals of Hindustan monkeys called bandar that can be taught to do tricks
The approval of a new drug is a four-stage process: (1) preclinical investigation, (2) clinical inve
Early in the twentieth century, when malnutrition was common, companies such as this one advertised
Corbel Vault, Interior of Tholos, The So-called Treasury of Atreus
Action Potential Membrane Potential