1) State lawmakers CAN make any law -- because technically, it isn't unconstitutional until it's been contested in the state supreme court, and then taken to the U.S. Supreme Court. (agree).
2) The state lawmakers have a duty and obligation to uphold not only the State's constitution, but the U.S. Constitution. The supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution would essentially render the laws unconstitutional, if contested. (disagree).
3) State lawmakers are elected by the citizens of their state, and their obligation is to those citizens, not to the country, as a whole -- it is their duty to fit within the social constructs established by their constituents. (agree).
4) State laws should be similar from state to state, to a certain degree, to allow for application of the full faith and credit clause, as guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. If there is no similarity, or a lack of continuity, per se -- then it could render the full faith and credit clause inapplicable. (disagree).
The correct statement about hormones-insulin and glucagon
A biological profile from the bony remains of an individual may be preferable to a DNA profile for a
The world has been horrified recently at a U.S. Congress so polarized and paralyzed that it cannot p
Reasons for Denied Claims and Solutions
Example of a patient statement.
Sociologists disagree about the relative significance of race and social class in determining social ...