Author Question: What is the traditional view that Liberals take on liberalizing agricultural trade? (Read 2454 times)

ricki

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Can anyone give me a very detailed answer?



Hungry!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,071

Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

TI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
That we do not need government dictating where and what we grow and to whom and where we buy or sell



Millan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
Is this homework?  

Liberalizing agricultural trade makes me wonder if you mean current "liberalism" or classic liberalism (me).  As a classic liberal it would go to a free market/laissez faire economy of trade (which we currently do not have).  It would also not provide federal government subsidies (per the Constitution) and would be competitive.  The farms success is based on competition GLOBALLY.  Good quality product (feed, grain, whatever) at a competitive price would determine the success or failure of that farm.



Jones

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
The agricultural business was socialized a long time ago under the Republicans. Nobody noticed and nobody cared.



Melanie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
i dont know, but i wouldnt want a bunch of transgenical pest trade in other countries.



federox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
I wholeheartedly agree with Liberty 4's answer. Farm subsidies make taxpayers in general unwilling (and unwitting) charitable donors to farmers.
It ought to be anethema to any Republican to grant subsidies to anyone;  but given where the votes are.....well, maybe we'll make an exception in that case.
Although I am a Republican, I must admit that the Democrats are less hypocritical in shovelling tax money in the direction of their supporters. e.g. the U.A.W..



federox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308

 

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

If you could remove all of your skin, it would weigh up to 5 pounds.

Did you know?

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis syndrome are life-threatening reactions that can result in death. Complications include permanent blindness, dry-eye syndrome, lung damage, photophobia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, permanent loss of nail beds, scarring of mucous membranes, arthritis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. Many patients' pores scar shut, causing them to retain heat.

Did you know?

The longest a person has survived after a heart transplant is 24 years.

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library