This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following is the argument offered against direct marketing in the form of direct phone ... (Read 116 times)

biggirl4568

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Which of the following is the argument offered against direct marketing in the form of direct phone solicitation?
 
  A. It is a waste and misuse of paper, adding to the depletion of forests and overtaxing landfills.
  B. It is an invasion of privacy.
  C. It is time consuming and intrusive.
  D. It is a significant inconvenience because of the considerable volume.

Question 2

Hampton argues that a group most unlikely to accept the constraints proposed by Gauthier
  is the group that
 
  a. holds the greatest wealth.
  b. is most talented.
  c. believes in an afterlife.
  d. is the most powerful.
  e. is the weakest.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

coyin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

d




biggirl4568

  • Member
  • Posts: 551
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


amandanbreshears

  • Member
  • Posts: 320
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

In 2006, a generic antinausea drug named ondansetron was approved. It is used to stop nausea and vomiting associated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

Did you know?

According to the FDA, adverse drug events harmed or killed approximately 1,200,000 people in the United States in the year 2015.

Did you know?

Always store hazardous household chemicals in their original containers out of reach of children. These include bleach, paint, strippers and products containing turpentine, garden chemicals, oven cleaners, fondue fuels, nail polish, and nail polish remover.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis syndrome are life-threatening reactions that can result in death. Complications include permanent blindness, dry-eye syndrome, lung damage, photophobia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, permanent loss of nail beds, scarring of mucous membranes, arthritis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. Many patients' pores scar shut, causing them to retain heat.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library