This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The decision in the Painter v. Bannister case illustrates A. an application of the tender-years ... (Read 62 times)

mmm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
The decision in the Painter v. Bannister case illustrates
 
  A. an application of the tender-years doctrine.
  B. the empirical basis for a custody decision.
  C. the discretion that judges have in evaluating the parents' acceptability for custody.
  D. a typical custody decision, as a result of two parents getting divorced.

Question 2

When did the standard of the best interests of the child come to the forefront, in child custody decisions?
 
  A. Around 1900
  B. Right after World War I
  C. Around 1950
  D. Around 1970



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

raili21

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

D





 

Did you know?

Certain topical medications such as clotrimazole and betamethasone are not approved for use in children younger than 12 years of age. They must be used very cautiously, as directed by a doctor, to treat any child. Children have a much greater response to topical steroid medications.

Did you know?

Blood is approximately twice as thick as water because of the cells and other components found in it.

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

Patients who cannot swallow may receive nutrition via a parenteral route—usually, a catheter is inserted through the chest into a large vein going into the heart.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library