This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The decision in the Painter v. Bannister case illustrates A. an application of the tender-years ... (Read 60 times)

mmm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
The decision in the Painter v. Bannister case illustrates
 
  A. an application of the tender-years doctrine.
  B. the empirical basis for a custody decision.
  C. the discretion that judges have in evaluating the parents' acceptability for custody.
  D. a typical custody decision, as a result of two parents getting divorced.

Question 2

When did the standard of the best interests of the child come to the forefront, in child custody decisions?
 
  A. Around 1900
  B. Right after World War I
  C. Around 1950
  D. Around 1970



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

raili21

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

D





 

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

Did you know?

Russia has the highest death rate from cardiovascular disease followed by the Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

When taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors, people should avoid a variety of foods, which include alcoholic beverages, bean curd, broad (fava) bean pods, cheese, fish, ginseng, protein extracts, meat, sauerkraut, shrimp paste, soups, and yeast.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library