Answer to Question 1
ANSWER:
a
Answer to Question 2
ANSWER:
Evidence from the research study suggested that a group or collective intelligence did emerge. For each group, performance across the different tasks was highly and positively correlated. Further statistical analyses ruled out the average individual intelligence of the group or the maximum individual intelligence of individuals in the group as significant predictors of group performance, leaving collective intelligence as a single, strong predictor of group performance.
What was the basis of this collective intelligence? Surprisingly, typical group features such as motivation, satisfaction, or group cohesion failed to predict group performance. Individual features, such as the individual intelligence of the members, also failed to predict group performance. Instead, the members scores on the social sensitivity instrument, called the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test, and how evenly speaking turns were distributed had a large impact on the groups collective intelligence.
Students will then discuss a personal experience of working on a group project and compare their experience to the findings of the research study.
The formation of micelles by amphipathic molecules
Common locations of urinary calculi formation.
Vast reserves of shale gas can be recovered through formation fracturing (“fracking”)
Tornado Formation
Formation of Concentrated Urine
Apoptosis in the formation of a human hand