Answer to Question 1
ANSWER:
a
Answer to Question 2
ANSWER:
Evidence from the research study suggested that a group or collective intelligence did emerge. For each group, performance across the different tasks was highly and positively correlated. Further statistical analyses ruled out the average individual intelligence of the group or the maximum individual intelligence of individuals in the group as significant predictors of group performance, leaving collective intelligence as a single, strong predictor of group performance.
What was the basis of this collective intelligence? Surprisingly, typical group features such as motivation, satisfaction, or group cohesion failed to predict group performance. Individual features, such as the individual intelligence of the members, also failed to predict group performance. Instead, the members scores on the social sensitivity instrument, called the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test, and how evenly speaking turns were distributed had a large impact on the groups collective intelligence.
Students will then discuss a personal experience of working on a group project and compare their experience to the findings of the research study.
Bone fractures that occur before death show signs of healing. The process of fracture healing starts
Formation of Acid Rain
NSAID-Induced Ulcer Formation
The engine is rotated until the timing marks on the front of the crankshaft line up with zero ...
Formation of the Appalachians
Formation of Concentrated Urine