This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Ex post facto research is less convincing than experimental research because a. there is no ... (Read 74 times)

fahad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Ex post facto research is less convincing than experimental research because
 
  a. there is no control over the dependent variables.
  b. differences in the independent variable were present before the start of the study.
  c. differences in the dependent variable were present before the start of the study.
  d. the independent variable preceded the dependent variable in time.
  e. b and c

Question 2

The internal validity threat that randomization eliminates in an experimental study is
 
  a. selection bias. c. instrumentation.
  b. subject effects. d. history.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

matt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A




fahad

  • Member
  • Posts: 570
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
:D TYSM


mcabuhat

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

About 3% of all pregnant women will give birth to twins, which is an increase in rate of nearly 60% since the early 1980s.

Did you know?

Pregnant women usually experience a heightened sense of smell beginning late in the first trimester. Some experts call this the body's way of protecting a pregnant woman from foods that are unsafe for the fetus.

Did you know?

Blood is approximately twice as thick as water because of the cells and other components found in it.

Did you know?

The first oncogene was discovered in 1970 and was termed SRC (pronounced "SARK").

Did you know?

The lipid bilayer is made of phospholipids. They are arranged in a double layer because one of their ends is attracted to water while the other is repelled by water.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library