This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following can be reassuring to a novice researcher who has been asked to critique a ... (Read 105 times)

Mr. Wonderful

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 866
Which of the following can be reassuring to a novice researcher who has been asked to critique a research study?
 
  a. A critique is an opinion. If the novice understands the research process and thinks critically, he or she has as much right to an opinion as an expert.
  b. If the researcher conducting the study has completed many previous studies, the individual critiquing the study can assume a quality study.
  c. Much of the critique is based on supposition anyway, so the novice has as much expertise as anyone when it comes to writing one.
  d. Because no one can prove anything in research, but only support previous work, a novice researcher is as skillful as the expert.

Question 2

Which of the following would represent a failure to adhere to ethical standards in a qualitative study?
 
  a. Conducting the study after first obtaining permission from the IRB
  b. Continuing to question a subject about a traumatic incident after the subject begins to openly sob and asks to be excused
  c. Mentioning that subjects had the right to refuse to participate in the study
  d. Not including all the specific details of a study in the informed consent document



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ErinKing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Answer to Question 1

ANS: A
A critique is an intellectual opinion statement; regardless of the educational or experience level of the writer.
Assuming that the study is a quality study would probably be intimidating, not encouraging.
The critique should be based on concrete information available in the research report.
Although this is true, it is not addressing the critique aspect of the question.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: B
There is a duty to protect from harmcontinuing to question could cause psychological harm to the subject.
Permission from the IRB is necessary with any study using human subjects.
As long as the subject is told that refusal is permitted, ethical standards are not violated.
Sometimes researchers cannot include every detail of the study in a qualitative study, but this does not violate ethical principles if the subjects are later debriefed.





 

Did you know?

Eat fiber! A diet high in fiber can help lower cholesterol levels by as much as 10%.

Did you know?

Oxytocin is recommended only for pregnancies that have a medical reason for inducing labor (such as eclampsia) and is not recommended for elective procedures or for making the birthing process more convenient.

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates’s recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

The most dangerous mercury compound, dimethyl mercury, is so toxic that even a few microliters spilled on the skin can cause death. Mercury has been shown to accumulate in higher amounts in the following types of fish than other types: swordfish, shark, mackerel, tilefish, crab, and tuna.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library