This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following would most likely not cause a full-thickness burn? A) electricity B) ... (Read 23 times)

WhattoUnderstand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 517
Which of the following would most likely not cause a full-thickness burn?
 
  A) electricity
  B) chemicals
  C) scalding
  D) hot grease

Question 2

Burns on the face or neck are extremely dangerous because:
 
  A) they don't heal well.
  B) they are almost always full-thickness burns.
  C) of possible burns to the eyes.
  D) they will need cosmetic surgery.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Kingjoffery

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

Answer: C

Answer to Question 2

Answer: C




WhattoUnderstand

  • Member
  • Posts: 517
Reply 2 on: Jul 12, 2018
Wow, this really help


debra928

  • Member
  • Posts: 342
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Barbituric acid, the base material of barbiturates, was first synthesized in 1863 by Adolph von Bayer. His company later went on to synthesize aspirin for the first time, and Bayer aspirin is still a popular brand today.

Did you know?

Between 1999 and 2012, American adults with high total cholesterol decreased from 18.3% to 12.9%

Did you know?

Cytomegalovirus affects nearly the same amount of newborns every year as Down syndrome.

Did you know?

Most childhood vaccines are 90–99% effective in preventing disease. Side effects are rarely serious.

Did you know?

In the United States, congenital cytomegalovirus causes one child to become disabled almost every hour. CMV is the leading preventable viral cause of development disability in newborns. These disabilities include hearing or vision loss, and cerebral palsy.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library