Author Question: Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436) held that the prosecution's use of statements of an accused, made ... (Read 75 times)

bobypop · **on:** Jul 12, 2018

Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436) held that the prosecution's use of statements of an accused, made to police without prior warnings of the person's rights to remain silent, to counsel, and to appointed counsel if indigent, was a violation of the accused's rights contained in

a. the First Amendment. c. the Sixth Amendment.
b. the Fourth Amendment. d. None of the above is correct.

Question 2

What is the purpose of the FBI's Uniform Crime Report?

A. To deter crime against property and people.
B. To encourage citizens to report crimes.
C. To explain, predict, and deter crimes that are committed on the streets, as well as in businesses.
D. To serve as an index to the number of crimes committed.