Author Question: Describe at least three ways in which youngsters in Piaget's formal operations stage are likely to ... (Read 76 times)

Hungry!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,071
Describe at least three ways in which youngsters in Piaget's formal operations stage are likely to think differently from those in the concrete operations stage. Illustrate each characteristic with a concrete example of how youngsters in each of the two stages might think or act.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Mr. Davis asks his third graders to conduct experiments to examine the effects of water, sunlight, and type of soil on growing sunflowers. He tells them, I want you to find out which of these three thingswater, sunlight, and soilaffect how well sunflowers grow. Here are lots of sunflower seeds, lots of paper cups to grow them in, and two different types of soil. You can give your growing plants plenty of sunlight by putting them on the shelf by the window, or you can grow them in a shadier place on the bookshelf behind my desk. And here's a measuring cup you can use to measure the amount of water you give them each day.
 
  Mr. Davis is assuming his third graders can do at least two things that, from Piaget's perspective, they probably cannot do. What two crucial abilities necessary for conducting appropriate experiments do his students probably not yet have? Justify your answer in a short paragraph.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



xiazhe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Answer to Question 1

Differences between youngsters in the concrete operations and formal operations stages include the following (the response should include at least three of these or reasonable facsimiles):
 Inability vs. ability to think about abstract ideas
 Inability vs. ability to think about hypothetical ideas
 Inability vs. ability to think about contrary-to-fact ideas
 Inability vs. ability to separate and control variables
 Inability vs. ability to formulate and test various hypotheses about a scientific phenomenon
 Inability vs. ability to understand and apply proportions (e.g., fractions, ratios, percentages)
 Thinking about what is in everyday reality (concrete operations) vs. about how things might be in an idealistic world (formal operations)
The response should illustrate each of the differences identified with a concrete example of how youngsters in the two stages might think or behave differently.

Answer to Question 2

Mr. Davis is assuming that his students can formulate and test multiple hypotheses and can separate and control variables. According to Piaget, these are abilities that emerge in formal operations. However, Mr. Davis' students, being about eight or nine years old, are probably still in concrete operations.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Bisphosphonates were first developed in the nineteenth century. They were first investigated for use in disorders of bone metabolism in the 1960s. They are now used clinically for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone metastasis, multiple myeloma, and other conditions that feature bone fragility.

Did you know?

Prostaglandins were first isolated from human semen in Sweden in the 1930s. They were so named because the researcher thought that they came from the prostate gland. In fact, prostaglandins exist and are synthesized in almost every cell of the body.

Did you know?

Addicts to opiates often avoid treatment because they are afraid of withdrawal. Though unpleasant, with proper management, withdrawal is rarely fatal and passes relatively quickly.

Did you know?

Computer programs are available that crosscheck a new drug's possible trade name with all other trade names currently available. These programs detect dangerous similarities between names and alert the manufacturer of the drug.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library